Many of the scientists today live guided by this notion that, “possessing much knowledge is much better’. Mostly, we spend majority of our acquired careers, or even our entire lives, trying our best to clearly understand the mystery of biological build mechanisms that are involved in almost every facet of our lives.
However, there is a possibility that we might never get satisfied provided that there lays a lot of science for discovery. Nonetheless, there are some circumstances whereby a lot of knowledge is perceived to be somewhat harmful.
A recent study that was conducted sorely by some of the scientists based at the Yale University, later published accordingly in the selected proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; whereby these researchers found out that the time clinicians happen to come across descriptions made to the patients with symptoms which was explained earlier using some information that focused much on genetics or neurobiology; their inner expression of much empathy felt for that patient tends to decrease.
A different study by Matthew Lebowtz showed that, putting more emphasis, or rather overemphasis on the biology in trying to clearly explain the psychopathology can at times prove to be dehumanizing maybe by largely reducing people who are of great worth to only mere or rather just simple biological-like mechanisms. However this is contrary to what is expected in the issue.
Two amongst most of the very crucial qualities most of the patients tend to search for sorely in physicians to consider them are first competency, and then compassion. Even though competency is thought as a mere function based on knowledge and also understanding the desired mechanisms those of a disease; all the doctors strictly must at any cost be very careful so as to avoid allowing their inborn and acquired knowledge to happen to dampen this compassion of theirs that the possess towards the clients they are entrusted with.
The earlier findings quoted above by Matthew Lebowtz happen to challenge this notion which puts it out that those biological based explanations elaborating mental perceived illness tend to majorly boost the compassion felt for ten millions of the Americans most of who are found suffering from serious mental-health perceived problems.
The conventional- wisdom strictly suggests the fact that these biological known explanations meant to explain psychiatric perceived symptoms are required to reduce greatly the rampant blame that the patients mostly get in return for the demonstrated behavior which emerge after allowing their genes and also their cells of the brains to become culprits. However, this should have ended up increasing the feelings expressed for compassion instead.
In other several studies in U.S, clinicians mostly the descriptions shown by patients who portrays symptoms those were earlier explained, in using some information that was seen to focus majorly on genetics, neurobiology and also childhood perceived experiences and finally circumstances of life that were stressful.
Among many questions asked, clinicians were at some point questioned on what extend they were compassionate towards an individual; which is a very essential and crucial element of the later therapy.
For more information visit For docs, more biology info means less empathy for mental health patients