<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking peer reviewed science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanbiotechnologist.com/blog/peer-reviewed-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanbiotechnologist.com/blog/peer-reviewed-science/</link>
	<description>Advancing the productivity of American Biotechnologists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerad L</title>
		<link>http://www.americanbiotechnologist.com/blog/peer-reviewed-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerad L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanbiotechnologist.com/blog/?p=2779#comment-5960</guid>
		<description>I believe the biggest reason to do away with the current peer review set-up is that it stops unpopular ideas from being published despite the support of the actual science. If you have evidence blowing up everyone&#039;s favorite theories they feel protective of you won&#039;t get published despite the evidence in the work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the biggest reason to do away with the current peer review set-up is that it stops unpopular ideas from being published despite the support of the actual science. If you have evidence blowing up everyone&#8217;s favorite theories they feel protective of you won&#8217;t get published despite the evidence in the work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
