When JIF Becomes a Dirty Word

It’s not that we are obsessed with the Journal Impact Factor, (OK so we’ve written about it at least 7 times on this blog), however, we do feel that it plays an important role in the life of budding scientists and we strongly identify with DORA’s call to abandon its use in evaluating scientific merit.

You can read more about our opinion on the JIF factor in the links provided below. The intention of this post, however, is to draw attention to DORA’s call for research scientists to provide examples of JIF-less metrics and methods that can be used in lieu of the JIF as a metric for scientific accomplishment.

Some examples include:

  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center’s recruiting policy which encourages candidates to discuss their most significant scientific accomplishment without referring to their JIF ranking
  • Germany’s Max Planck Society is asking its recruits to provide full copies of the three papers which they consider to be their best ones-independent of their JIF ranking
  • The American Society for Cell Biology has moved away from the JIF and now evaluates candidates for the prestigious ASCB Kaluza Prizes based-upon the significance of discoveries they have made

To learn more about DORA’s call to abandon reliance on Journal Impact factors (JIFs) and adopt more enlightened approaches visit the DORA website.

For more information see:
Exploring scientific productivity
The Ugly Side of the Journal Impact Factor
Don’t Judge Me-I’m a Scientist
A Journal Impact Factor Scandal
Nobel Prize Winners Address Brutal Cuts in Federal Funding
The Journal Impact Factor and the Lazy Scientist
A YouTube Rebellion to the Journal Impact Factor

Tags:

Leave a Reply